tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5566218255593508712.post4947126493395500102..comments2023-07-04T08:41:57.862-04:00Comments on The Baltimore Spectator: Police Shoot At Unarmed ManThe Baltimore Spectatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15897704321889584404noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5566218255593508712.post-54253701931258271072009-06-14T14:35:33.919-04:002009-06-14T14:35:33.919-04:00You should be a more careful observer dan. The he...You should be a more careful observer dan. The headline says police shoot AT unarmed man. Indeed they did. The article is valid in that it still tells a story about a police officer discharging his weapon. In a crowded urban environment, this is ALWAYS a story. Whether the firing of the weapon was justified or not.<br /><br />If it wasn't a big deal, then why does so much paperwork need be filled out every time an officer fires his weapon?MacArthur Media Staffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01608383785940472510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5566218255593508712.post-3084208421533500362009-06-13T10:15:57.493-04:002009-06-13T10:15:57.493-04:00If he was not shot by police, then do the honorabl...If he was not shot by police, then do the honorable thing and remove the giant ass headlines that are larger then the correction. you shouldnt even have the article up at that point.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15053069196347809734noreply@blogger.com